ObamaCare Should Pay For Adoptions

ObamaCare should pay for adoptions.

Its only fair, the pro-abort crowd gets what they want with taxpayer-funded murder, so why not give to the pro-life side as well, with taxpayer-funded adoption?

If the pro-choice crowd is really about “choice” they should embrace this idea wholeheartedly. Since Democrats and the champions of the farce they call a health care bill are pro-choice, why not make it easier to choose life if they make it easier and more affordable to adopt?

So how about it Choicers? How about taxpayer-funded adoption? This would truly give women a “choice”. Or are you just about killing babies?




  1. leenilee · November 13, 2012

    You do realize that the government already DOES partially fund adoptions, right? It’s called the adoption tax credit…just an FYI.

    • Jennifer King · November 13, 2012

      So? If they are going to fully fund the murder of a baby, they should also fully fund the adoption of a child.

      • Thinkaboutit · November 13, 2012

        Except adoption cost A LOT MORE then abortion often reaching sometime to 50,000 dollars. That’s an idiotic claim to make especially since most adoptions won’t get approved.

      • Emsley · November 13, 2012

        You do realize that abortions cost less then adoptions. If adoptions where fully paid for by tax dollars it could further drive us Ito debt. Isn’t that something republicans/conservatives complain about?

      • Jennifer King · November 13, 2012

        To Emsley and Thinkaboutit,

        Since ObamaCare is all about Controlling the costs of healthcare, they should also control the cost of adoption. Like I said in the post, make adoption MORE AFFORDABLE. Can’t you read?

  2. ck · November 13, 2012

    You do realize Obama voted NO to funds for adoptions? He votes 241 for pro abortion legislation. Spends taxpayer money for abortions to Mexico and Kenya?? Is he all about murder? No one will vote in personhood amendments but will vote for doctors to help kill their patients in assisted suicide. It’s all about which is cheaper and eaiser. Is that why 90% of the babies that will be born with Down’s syndrome are aborted after the mother finds out? Interviews from people with Down’s syndrome find that they are happy. They can even be productive and contribute to our society. You really think they are aborted because it is best for them to be killed? Or is it just easier for everyone else? and cheaper. I see that the prochoicers think death is okay but life is not. It is all about the money and which is easier for that moment. But not that which is really best.

    • Jennifer King · November 13, 2012

      Yes I do realize that. Obama is the biggest pro-abort president in history. I agree with everything you have to say. I have special needs children, and they are both very happy and a blessing to our family. Down syndrome children are aborted simply because the parent doesn’t want to shoulder the burden of having a special needs child, even though they don’t have a clue as to the severity of the condition until after the child is born.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s